So let me get this straight. A bunch of international do gooders who found a place for the ‘oppressed’ Jews last Century now have to find a place for the people they displaced by placing the Jews there in the first place.
A campaign probably being supported by the descendants of the people who supported the creation of Israel.
Does this mean that in a hundred years my descendants are going to be campaigning for another group of people that were displaced by the Palestinians?
Not if you don’t breed.
It’s very true.
Sykes Picot. Sykes Picot.
Not really.
And the settlements in the West Bank are illegal but we have to adhere to international norms.
Correct.
So, we create the situation for the displacement of people that allows for the creation of new borders that allows for the state to avoid responsibility for the movement of people that allows for……I’m lost.
Let’s take Sanmarco. There is an example of environmental concerns leading to better corporate responsibility.
It was probably a loss making enterprise. Why do we need disasters to better govern the environment? We all know the world is populated by cars and electronic devices.
Perhaps it is the beginning of real
I have seen the water of Centennial Park ponds. Have you measured the impact of massive building enterprises on finite resources?
I was too busy listening to your Toughen Up Prince rant against the military behemoths that offended your sensibility while driving a rather large car through the Eastern Suburbs.
They have big homes, health and meals paid for by the government and taxpayer while fighting an ephemeral enemy that seems to allude them. Toughen up Princess? I think Find An Enemy Pencil Dick would work well on my car.
The submarine issue
We all know where that is headed and we know when and how and where. How this feeds into environmental concerns hasn’t been made exactly clear now, has it?
You’ve missed the India Australia
No I haven’t. I am just taking my time. And tell Malcolm to get rid of that tangerine tie. It’s vile.